Last week, I bared my soul about the less-than-smart aspects of my Systems Thinking journey, which generated a lot of positive subscriber comments (thank you!).
But today, I’m going to switch directions.
Let’s jump right in by considering one critical comment I received:
“Like this! But, truth is, most issues are overcomplicated—crime, homelessness, income growth—because it’s fashionable to say there is no silver bullet. Even where there is one.”
Well, I hope my talk of complexity hasn’t been contributing to the current epidemic of poor leadership on tough problems like homelessness and crime, nor the lack of community push-back on virtue-signaling stupidity.
Harsh words?
Perhaps.
But we must acknowledge that complex problems can sometimes be exploited as a justification for utopian schemes or, worse yet, incompetence.
Today I examine 3 real-world examples of so-called changemakers unknowingly (and sometimes even with the best of intentions) tying problem solving knots.
Then, I’ll give you 4 ways pragmatic leaders can untie or cut through these knots so you can get back to making progress regardless of complexity.
The Side Effects of Overcomplicating
The belief that intricate problems require intricate solutions can result in unnecessary convolution, hindering the identification of straightforward, pragmatic approaches.
Perhaps this is because there’s a tendency to equate complexity with sophistication, leading people to overlook simple and effective solutions.
Let’s delve into three real-world examples where people tend to overcomplicate problems, often by adopting grandiose approaches rather than focusing on practical solutions:
1. Homelessness: The Quest for Systemic Change
Overcomplication: Addressing homelessness is vital, but some may overcomplicate the issue by advocating for systemic changes that, while noble, can hinder immediate relief efforts.
Example: Rather than immediately addressing reported issues of homeless individuals—providing shelter, mental health support, and job assistance—some argue for making housing a human right or attempting to control every apartment’s rent from city hall. While these systemic changes may be noble in intent, they can slow down urgently needed assistance for those currently without shelter, or make matters worse.
2. Law Enforcement: The Call for Radical Transformation
Overcomplication: The call for revolutionary change in law enforcement, questioning the very existence of police, can overshadow practical and immediate measures to ensure public safety.
Example: Instead of focusing on enhancing police training, community engagement, and accountability measures, some advocate for a complete overhaul of law enforcement structures. While reform is essential, the emphasis on questioning the very existence of police may divert attention and resources from the necessary and achievable improvements in the current system.
3. Philanthropy: Rethinking the Entire Field
Overcomplication: The push to change the entire field of philanthropy, moving away from outcome-based approaches, can lead to hesitation in supporting proven nonprofit programs.
Example: Rather than investing in nonprofit programs with a proven track record in addressing specific issues, some argue for a radical shift in the philosophy of philanthropy. This may involve moving away from measuring outcomes and towards more abstract, systemic changes. While a shift in philanthropic approaches can be beneficial, it shouldn’t overshadow the importance of supporting effective programs with tangible results.
In each of these examples, the risk lies in the potential delay or neglect of immediate, effective solutions due to a focus on sweeping, systemic changes.
“No silver bullet” becomes a convenient escape route, allowing leaders to avoid taking responsibility for the poor outcomes of their proposed policies and actions.
After all, they can always blame the complexity of the problem or less-than-perfect realization of their vision.
The Road to Effective Solutions
Acknowledging complexity should inspire pragmatic action, not perpetuate utopian schemes or excuse incompetence.
Here are four basic strategies that almost always help to untie the knots of overcomplication and grandiose reaction:
1. Get Informed with Primary Research and Weigh Trade-offs
- Comprehensive research and an understanding of trade-offs provide a solid foundation for decision-making. It dispels the myth that complexity justifies extremism and guides informed choices.
2. Design a Process to Manage the Problem
- Instead of searching for a mythical silver bullet to solve the problem once and for all, design processes that manage the problem over the long-term. This involves setting realistic expectations, recognizing the multifaceted nature of the challenge, and implementing incremental steps.
3. Measure Results and Seek Incremental Progress
- Establish achievable milestones and measure results. Seeking incremental progress, even as modest as a 10% improvement per year, ensures a steady course toward improvement without falling prey to the illusion of quick fixes.
4. Liberally Apply a Tradition of Criticism and Fallibility
- Foster a culture that welcomes criticism and acknowledges fallibility. Constant evaluation and refinement of ideas and strategies prevent the misuse of complexity as an excuse and promote continuous improvement.
In some ways, these types of actions are the silver bullets of incremental progress.
They’re not sexy or overcomplicated, nor do they need policy experts from think tanks.
Instead, they are the kinds of basic ideas you’d hear from a grandparent or preschool teacher.
Navigating with Humility and Purpose
We must strike a delicate balance between immediate, practical measures and the pursuit of visionary, systemic change.
The real-world examples serve as cautionary tales, urging us not to lose sight of the urgency of today’s problems while we aspire to shape a better tomorrow.
Addressing homelessness, improving law enforcement, and revolutionizing philanthropy are noble aspirations, but they shouldn’t hinder our ability to extend immediate assistance, enact tangible reforms, and support proven solutions.
The essence lies in embracing both the pragmatism required for today’s challenges and the vision essential for long-term transformation.
And here’s what you need to remember most:
It’s the pragmatic steps – the rigorous problem management over time – that become the very vehicle for achieving long-term transformation.
Incremental progress, informed decisions, and continuous evaluation form the backbone of sustained change.
By actively managing the complexities we face today, we lay the foundation for a transformed tomorrow.
See you next week.
==
Whenever you’re ready, there are two ways I can help you:
→ I’m a strategic advisor for the toughest societal problems like poverty, crime and homelessness. People come to me when they want to stop spinning their wheels and get transformative, systems-level change.
→ I’m a coach for emerging and executive leaders in the social and public sectors who want to make progress on their biggest goals and challenges.
Let’s find out how I can help you become transformational.
